In the 2024 Paris Olympics, a thrilling exchange between Germany’s Satou Sabally and the USA’s Breanna Stewart showcased the high level of talent in women’s basketball. As Sabally nailed a three-pointer, followed by a long two from Stewart, the crowd of over 25,000 at Stade Pierre Mauroy roared in appreciation. This kind of star-powered matchup is something fans would love to see more frequently, but due to the WNBA prioritization rule, such encounters are unfortunately rare.
The game saw the U.S. women’s team, leveraging their depth, pull away for an 87-68 victory over Germany, securing the top spot in Group C and advancing to the quarterfinals. Stewart and A’ja Wilson, both two-time WNBA MVPs, led the American side, while Sabally was the standout for Germany, leading her team with 15 points.
However, the bigger issue at play is how the WNBA’s prioritization rule impacts the availability of top international players like Sabally. This rule, part of the league’s collective bargaining agreement, forces veteran players to choose between playing in the WNBA or overseas, where they can earn significantly more money. As a result, many international stars are unable to commit to the WNBA season, which limits the global talent pool and the quality of competition.
Kelsey Plum of Team USA highlighted the issue, noting that players like Alexis Peterson, who played for Germany in the Olympics, could easily be starting for a WNBA team if not for these restrictions. The WNBA, in contrast to the NBA, remains heavily focused on American talent, whereas the NBA thrives on its global roster, featuring stars from all over the world.
Sabally criticized the rule, arguing that it unfairly penalizes international players and hinders the league’s potential. She pointed out that the NBA has successfully integrated international players, helping to grow the game globally. Sabally and others believe the WNBA needs to adopt a similar approach to maintain its claim as the best women’s basketball league in the world.
Stewart, who has balanced playing in the WNBA and overseas, acknowledged the complexity of the situation but hopes that future collective bargaining agreements will make the WNBA a more attractive option for international players. There are suggestions that the league could consider shifting to a winter schedule, but Stewart believes other issues need addressing first.
WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert has the authority to reconsider the prioritization rule, which Sabally believes could be a crucial step in making the league more welcoming to international talent. The current situation, where players often earn more overseas, forces difficult choices that could be mitigated with a more flexible approach from the league.
The WNBA’s summer schedule complicates the participation of international players, as evidenced by French stars Gabby Williams and Marine Johannes, who missed the first half of the season due to their commitments to their national team. While they were allowed to return without penalty, such exceptions are rare.
The NBA’s journey towards globalization offers a roadmap for the WNBA. As Cheryl Reeve, head coach of the U.S. women’s team, pointed out, the NBA’s integration of international talent has only enhanced the league. For the WNBA to truly be the best women’s basketball league in the world, it needs to embrace a similar global perspective.
If the WNBA continues to limit the participation of top international players, it risks falling short of its potential. The league’s future success depends on its ability to incorporate the best talent from around the world, creating a truly global stage for women’s basketball
Comments