The Los Angeles Lakers, once a powerhouse in the NBA, have found themselves at the center of a brewing controversy this offseason. Despite high expectations to be active in the free agency market, the Lakers have made no significant player acquisitions, leading to scrutiny and criticism from various corners of the basketball world. ESPN’s recent league insider poll highlighted the “worst move of the NBA offseason,” and the Lakers’ inactivity has not gone unnoticed.
Bron. Brow. Connection 😤 pic.twitter.com/iXgClkOL4s
— Los Angeles Lakers (@Lakers) July 28, 2024
The Los Angeles Lakers were expected to make major moves this offseason following a disappointing 4-1 first-round playoff exit to the Denver Nuggets in late April. With an aging core led by superstars LeBron James and Anthony Davis, many saw this summer as potentially the franchise’s last chance to make a serious push for another championship. The anticipation was that the Lakers would acquire a third star-caliber player to complement James and Davis, thereby strengthening their title contention.
However, the reality has been starkly different. The Los Angeles Lakers have not signed or traded for any new players since the start of free agency. Their only offseason additions have been rookies Dalton Knecht and Bronny James. At the same time, the team has lost two veteran rotation pieces, Spencer Dinwiddie and Taurean Prince. This lack of activity has raised eyebrows and led to skepticism about the Lakers’ strategy and future prospects.
On Monday, ESPN’s Tim Bontemps published a survey of 18 NBA coaches, scouts, and executives titled “NBA offseason survey: Best, worst and most shocking moves.” In the “worst move of the NBA offseason” section, the Lakers received one vote for their offseason “inactivity.” While this was just one of ten moves to receive at least one vote, the mere inclusion of the Lakers in this category is telling. The leading vote-getters were “Chicago’s part in the DeMar DeRozan trade,” “Sacramento’s part in the DeRozan trade,” and “Paul George signed by the 76ers,” each receiving three votes.
Some remain optimistic that the Lakers’ coaching change, swapping Darvin Ham for first-time coach JJ Redick, will help the team reinvent itself. Redick, known for his sharp basketball mind and fresh approach, brings a new dynamic to the Lakers. However, at least one league insider isn’t so bullish on this change being enough to offset the lack of roster improvements.
In addition to their mention in the “worst move of the NBA offseason” poll, the Lakers also featured in the “NBA’s worst offseason” results, tying for fourth place. One coach, scout, or executive ranked the Lakers’ offseason as the league’s worst. The Denver Nuggets led the way, receiving six votes, followed by the Chicago Bulls (five votes) and LA Clippers (four votes).
The Bulls and Clippers both lost star players in free agency, leading to a flurry of smaller moves to fill the gaps. Meanwhile, the Nuggets lost key role players Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Reggie Jackson but made notable signings like ex-MVP Russell Westbrook and big man Dario Saric. All three teams’ rosters look noticeably different from last season, highlighting their active approach to the offseason. In stark contrast, the Lakers’ roster remains virtually unchanged, barring a significant trade in the upcoming months.
The Lakers’ decision to remain largely inactive this offseason is baffling, given their current roster’s limited window for championship contention. LeBron James, though still a formidable force, is nearing the twilight of his career. Anthony Davis has struggled with injuries, making the need for additional star power even more critical. The lack of urgency in bolstering the roster is a gamble that could have long-term repercussions.
The Lakers’ complacency this offseason might be one of the summer’s biggest failures. While other teams have made bold moves to strengthen their lineups, the Lakers have chosen to stand pat. This decision reflects either a misplaced confidence in their current roster or a lack of strategic vision. If the Lakers fail to make a deep playoff run next season, the blame will likely fall squarely on this offseason’s inactivity. For a franchise with such a storied history and high expectations, this approach is not only risky but could be seen as negligent.
As the new season approaches, the spotlight will be on the Lakers to prove their doubters wrong. Their success or failure will not only impact their immediate future but could also shape the legacy of one of the greatest players of all time, LeBron James. The stakes have never been higher, and the pressure is on.
Comments