In the world of sports gaming, few controversies ignite passions like player ratings. Memphis Grizzlies star Jaren Jackson Jr. recently stirred the pot with his outspoken critique of Jokic’s rating in NBA 2K25, revealing a simmering discontent within the league.
Jaren Jackson Jr. Calls Out NBA 2K25: Is Jokic’s Rating a Smack in the Face?
On The Old Man and The Three podcast, Jackson Jr. vented his frustration, remarking, “Joker’s got three MVPs and he’s rated a 97? If I had three MVPs, I’d be fuming if I got the same rating.” His comment struck a chord, suggesting that the NBA 2K25 ratings might not fully capture a player’s real-life impact.
The latest edition of NBA 2K25 has named Jokic, Luka Doncic, and Giannis Antetokounmpo as the game’s top-rated players, each earning a 97 rating. Jokic’s recent acquisition of his third MVP title positions him at the pinnacle of the game’s ratings, but Jackson Jr. isn’t buying it.
Joining Jokic, Doncic, and Antetokounmpo in the upper echelons are Joel Embiid and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, both earning a solid 96. The likes of LeBron James, Stephen Curry, and Jayson Tatum follow closely with a 95 rating, demonstrating the game’s attempt to balance past and present legends. Kevin Durant and Anthony Davis trail with a 94 rating, and Anthony Edwards makes a notable appearance at 93.
Meanwhile, rookie sensation Victor Wembanyama starts strong with a 91 rating, and veterans like Kyrie Irving, Kawhi Leonard, and Donovan Mitchell are solidly ranked in the low 90s.
Jackson’s reaction underscores a broader debate in the basketball community: are video game ratings an accurate reflection of real-life performance, or just a source of endless debate? His candid remarks ignite curiosity about how these ratings influence perceptions and the way players are valued both on and off the court.
As the NBA 2K25 ratings continue to spark heated discussions, one thing remains clear: the game’s ratings are as fiercely contested as the matches themselves. The controversy surrounding Jokic’s rating is just one example of how digital assessments can fuel real-world tensions, adding a layer of drama to the ongoing dialogue about player performance and recognition.
Comments