NBA veteran and 2008 champion Kendrick Perkins has recently expressed deep regret over his voting for Rudy Gobert as the Defensive Player of the Year (DPOY). Now an analyst and TV personality for ESPN, Perkins shared his discontent following a pivotal Game 3 in the Western Conference semifinals, where Luka Doncic scored a game-winning shot over Gobert. The incident has made Perkins question his decision and the credibility of the award itself.
Gobert, known for his exceptional interior defense, found himself isolated on the perimeter against Doncic, one of the league’s most dynamic offensive talents. The switch, which Doncic confirmed was intentional, left Gobert vulnerable. This moment proved critical as the Mavericks pushed the Timberwolves to a 3-0 series deficit. For Perkins, this scenario was the tipping point.
While discussing the game on ESPN’s First Take, Perkins didn’t hold back his frustration. “I have the biggest regret in my media career,” he said. “Me voting this season for Rudy Gobert is an embarrassment for me for Defensive Player of the Year. Every single time in the postseason, that becomes a defensive liability.” His comments reflect a broader sentiment that Gobert’s defensive prowess doesn’t always translate to the playoffs, where versatility on defense becomes crucial.
Gobert’s reputation as an elite rim protector is well-deserved. His towering presence in the paint has earned him multiple DPOY awards, highlighting his ability to alter shots and deter drives. However, his difficulty defending quicker, perimeter-oriented players has been a recurring issue. Opponents have exploited this by forcing switches and drawing him away from his comfort zone near the basket.
This postseason, Gobert’s defensive stats have declined. While he averaged 2.1 blocks per game during the regular season—a figure consistent with his career average—he has managed only one block per game against the Mavericks. Perkins highlighted this downturn, noting, “He’s the first player that we see every single time in the postseason that becomes a defensive liability. When I look at Rudy, he has tarnished the Defensive Player of the Year award. He’s not respected by his peers.”
Adding to the critique, Perkins pointed out the contrasting performance of Gobert’s teammate, Karl-Anthony Towns. In the Timberwolves’ series against the Denver Nuggets, Towns was lauded for his defensive contributions, especially against MVP candidate Nikola Jokic. Towns’ ability to step up defensively, both in the paint and on the perimeter, garnered praise from fans and analysts, further overshadowing Gobert’s limitations.
It’s essential to remember that the DPOY, like the MVP award, is based on regular-season performance. Gobert’s regular-season numbers are undeniably impressive, consistently ranking him among the league’s top defenders. However, his playoff struggles bring into question the weight and implications of regular-season awards in evaluating overall player impact. Perkins’ critique underscores this disconnect, suggesting that postseason performance should perhaps play a more significant role in these accolades.
In light of his regret, Perkins declared he would no longer participate in voting for individual regular-season awards. His disillusionment with his vote for Gobert marks a significant moment in his media career, as he vows to step back from a process he now views as flawed. This decision reflects a broader debate within the NBA community about the criteria for such awards and their relevance in the context of postseason performance.
Kendrick Perkins’ outspoken regret about voting for Rudy Gobert as DPOY brings to light critical issues within the NBA’s award system. His comments echo a broader frustration among analysts and fans regarding the disconnect between regular-season accolades and postseason performance. Gobert’s case exemplifies this gap, where a player’s regular-season dominance doesn’t necessarily translate to playoff success.
Perkins’ decision to abstain from future voting could spark further discussions about how these awards are determined and whether changes are needed to ensure they accurately reflect a player’s comprehensive impact on the game. As the NBA continues to evolve, these conversations are crucial for maintaining the integrity and relevance of its honors and recognitions.
Comments