Shaquille O’Neal has ignited a storm with his latest bombshell, labeling Rudy Gobert as the worst NBA player of all time. In a recent interview with Complex, the basketball icon, notorious for his no-holds-barred commentary, didn’t spare any punches. He not only targeted Gobert but also slammed Ben Simmons, deeming him one of the NBA’s Biggest Disappointments.
Ben Simmons and Rudy Gobert: The NBA’s Biggest Disappointments?
O’Neal’s criticism of Gobert centers on his hefty $250 million contract. “If you’re earning that kind of money, you better deliver,” Shaq declared. “There’s a reason I limp and can’t turn my neck—it’s because I played hard for my $120 million. So seeing guys like Gobert game the system and still rake in millions without performing is something I can’t respect.” Shaq’s words were blunt, reflecting his frustration with perceived inequities in sports salaries.
This isn’t the first time Shaq has stirred the pot with his candid opinions. He believes that by making such high salaries, players like Gobert fail to meet the expectations that come with such massive contracts. “People think I’m hating, but I’m just speaking the truth,” Shaq added, pointing to the disparity between high-paid athletes and essential workers like teachers and doctors who earn far less despite their crucial roles.
However, Gobert, a four-time Defensive Player of the Year, isn’t without his merits. Throughout his decade-long NBA career, he’s played in 757 games, averaging 12.7 points and 11.8 rebounds per game. Last season alone, Gobert posted impressive stats with 14.0 points, 12.9 rebounds, 2.1 blocks, and 1.3 assists per game, showcasing his defensive prowess and contributing significantly to the Minnesota Timberwolves.
Shaq’s harsh criticism seems to reflect a broader debate on player salaries and performance standards in professional sports. While Gobert has demonstrated considerable skill and earned accolades for his defensive abilities, the disparity between his performance and his paycheck has left some, including Shaq, questioning the value and fairness of such contracts.
Comments