Teams and players including Anthony Davis, Ja Morant, and more are attempting more three-pointers than previously. The Boston Celtics spearhead the effort, taking an unprecedented 55.1% of their attempts from three-point range. This dependence on the three-point shot has sparked worries among fans who perceive the new style of play as fragmented and tedious.
Is It Just “Three and D” Now?
Certain fans claim that continuous three-point shooting depletes the game’s variety, particularly when contrasted with the post-up plays of the ’90s era. Ja Morant and Anthony Davis exemplify contemporary “aberration players” who incorporate mid-range shots along with drives. This diversity brings thrill and evokes memories of basketball’s historical periods.
Could Rule Changes Help?
The three-point line was introduced by the NBA in 1979, transforming the game. Currently, voices such as Kirk Goldsberry’s are advocating for another evolution—extending the line further away. This adjustment might render three-point shots more difficult, highlighting exceptional shooters such as Stephen Curry and Damian Lillard. Even Bill Simmons theorized that removing the “corner three” could introduce a fresh aspect to team strategy, although some fear it might unintentionally disrupt spacing.
The Australian Connection
For Australian athletes such as Josh Giddey and Dyson Daniels, the focus on three-pointers poses a challenge. Giddey, who was recently acquired by the Chicago Bulls due to his restricted shooting ability, and Dyson, who is concentrating on defense, are adjusting to the NBA’s perimeter shooting expectations.
Testing New Ideas
There is discussion about trying out these modifications during the pre-season or perhaps the All-Star Game. Limiting the number of three-pointers allowed in a game or changing the arc design could be tested. Giving fans and players a chance to observe how these regulations would affect the game’s pace and thrill.
Comments