Patrick Beverley, the outspoken NBA veteran, has thrown another curveball at the basketball world with what some are calling Patrick Beverley’s Wild Plan: a 4-point line. The mere mention of such a change has fans buzzing, with excitement and controversy brewing across the sports landscape. But what does this mean for the game we love?
Patrick Beverley’s Wild Plan: A 4-Point Line for the NBA?
Picture this: A line stretching 27 feet from the hoop, daring only the bravest and most skilled to launch a shot that could change the course of a game in a heartbeat. This idea isn’t entirely new; the Philippine Basketball Association (PBA) has already dipped its toes into these waters. The NBA, ever the trendsetter, might just be next.
Beverley recently shared his thoughts on the idea on his podcast. With his characteristic candor, he said, “I wouldn’t put it past the NBA. They love to test new things, shake things up.” He speculated that the league might try it out for a season, perhaps even using the G League as a testing ground, to see how fans and players would react. The idea is bold—no doubt—but is it brilliant or bonkers?
Let’s be real: Basketball purists are probably cringing at the thought. “You’d be scoring a lot of points, but the shooting percentages would be terrible,” Beverley quipped. And he has a point. Imagine the circus that would ensue—players launching from beyond 27 feet, hoping to cash in on those extra points. While a 4-point shot could make for some thrilling finishes, the downside could be a wave of ill-advised, low-percentage shots that might disrupt the flow of the game.
Beverley also raised another critical point: not everyone should have the green light to shoot from that distance. “I’m not defending those,” he added, suggesting that the privilege of attempting such audacious shots should be reserved for sharpshooters. Let’s face it: some players can barely make a three-pointer, let alone a four-pointer. The introduction of a 4-point line could create a clear divide between sharpshooters and everyone else, turning basketball into even more of a specialist’s game.
The introduction of the three-point line in 1979 revolutionized the NBA, shifting the game’s dynamics and strategy forever. Could a 4-point line do the same? Or would it create chaos on the court? Beverley’s skepticism is shared by many. He knows the game inside out, and while he’s all for innovation, he’s also wary of the potential downside. “People struggle with 3s. There’s no way they’d be consistent with a four-point shot,” he argued.
As an editor, I see this as more than just a hypothetical experiment. The NBA, known for pushing boundaries, could seriously consider this to keep fans engaged. However, we must ask ourselves: Is this a clever evolution of the game or a desperate gimmick to boost viewership? Only time will tell. One thing’s for sure—the debate over the 4-point line is far from over. It’s a risky move that could either revolutionize the sport or backfire spectacularly.
Comments